To anyone who has read what I’ve written before on matters which concern separation of church and state or the negative consequences of the Enlightenment, this article will be no surprise. Due to history, my pacifism and Anabaptist theology, I do not see socio-polticial conservatism as Christianity. My beliefs do not require others to share my faith and views. I do not believe a Judeo-Christian theonomy is the goal or even the responsibility of the Church. Yet, I do see it is the responsibility of Christians to pray for all who are in authority. So far as is morally possible, it is the duty of the Christian to follow the laws of society.
These things being duly stated and in holding to a separation between church and state, a.k.a. freedom of religion, I call US governments (local and federal) to be consistent. Either no religion should be allowed in governmental institutions & standardized medicine, or all religions should be allowed fair representation.
Christianity has not been allowed a fair representation in US society, when one considers the following:
- At Courthouses:
- At Public and State Schools: (Since the early 90’s, there has been a rise of eastern mystic practice in public schools, while Christianity has been increasingly scuttled since the 60’s.)
- Judge makes a ruling on yoga classes at Encinitas Union School District via ABC News
- The Goldie Hawn Foundation (Goldie Hawn is a self-announced Buddhist) and its “scientific” meditation in schools
- Satanic group’s plan to hand out coloring books has Florida schools re-thinking policy via Fox News
- Chunyun (Claudia) Wang, PhD, CHES | Monroe County Community School Corp., Bloomington, IN (2012)… Principal investigator. Incorporating Health Qigong and meditation into elementary school classrooms. in connection with The Tibetan Mongolian Buddhist Cultural Center
- [also] Major Corporations Funding ‘Gay’ Indoctrination in Elementary Schools Across America
Read more at http://barbwire.com/2014/12/30/0655-major-corporations-funding-gay-indoctrination-elementary-schools-across-america/
- As Promoted in Nationalized Standards for “Complementary and Alternative Medicine” and Standard Psychology Practice:
- The Surprising Story of How Religion-based Alternative Medicine Gained Mainstream Acceptance via Indiana University News Room, Candy Brown
- The Healing Gods: Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Christian America via Oxford University Press
- As Promoted in Popular and Corporate Practice, a.k.a “self-help” or “yoga:” (a “demystified” form of “meditation” does not render it irreligious.)
- Yoga – Relaxation or Occult? via Rapidnet and also Shalach.org
- Does Meditation Really Work? Excerpt from Dan Harris’s Self-Help Book via Reporter-Times
I am not so naive as to think governmental officials are oblivious to the so-called religion-free “science” behind agendas like Goldie Hawn’s or Claudia Wang’s “meditation” in schools. As Candy Brown writes,
“I started asking, ‘Who is involved with this? Why is it becoming mainstream?'” she said. “I was surprised by how little scientific evidence supports claims that CAM is safe and effective. For many of the most popular CAM therapies, there is an absence of rigorous scientific research showing that CAM is more effective than conventional medicine, non-religious exercise and relaxation, a healthy diet, Christian prayer practices, or a simple placebo. And there is evidence that CAM can be dangerous.”
One explanation for CAM’s acceptance, she said, is that some practitioners have been less than transparent, or even deceptive, in their marketing. They have played down the religious meanings of practices and exaggerated the scientific evidence of benefits.
Of course, even momentary practical thought would indicate government cannot possibly accommodate all religions, whether in schools, medical practice or otherwise. This was a tenet the founding fathers of the U.S.A. foresaw, as much as I might disagree with their own religious views. On the other hand, and perhaps differing from my fellow biblicist evangelical Christians, I do not believe Christianity should be given a place above other religions in state education or standardized health. I believe it should be allowed a fair and equal representation. No one religion should be given place before another when it comes to governmental involvement; but no one religion should be discriminated either.
At the same time, it is delusion to think that any institution (governmental or not) can be free from religious influences. The truth is our American society accommodates the will of the people, as represented through elected officials and individual votes. That means each individual’s religious beliefs are given power at the voting boxes. The laws of the land reflect its people’s beliefs in our country. Is that not sufficient? Perhaps it is not sufficient in a day of corruption at every level and when only the rich can run for elected office. Therefore, Christians need to re-learn how to navigate a society where Christian values are not the majority; and that, while some standards of morality will always be legislated, Christ’s kingdom isn’t something which can be expunged from or passed into law. But, individual Christian’s influences can and should be felt in private and public life.
Other nations do things differently. For example, in America, parents still have the right to educate their children themselves, or by whatever legitimate standard they choose. This is a great freedom. But, in Germany, that is not the case. State schools are mandatory… and one had better believe that the atheistic philosophies, naturalism, scientism and one-world agenda of “leaders” are behind that system. Again, one cannot prevent spiritual and philosophical influences upon institutions and governments. He must learn how to live within them yet not be “of” them.
If US government is to be consistent, then it must give no weight to one religion above another. Philosophically speaking, this cannot possibly be done. On the theoretical level, it can be said. But, separation of church and state is obviously easier said than done. The best solution is “freedom of religion.” If an individual wishes to express religion in the educational context, in medical choices or in business, then ideally that should be allowed within reason (i.e. not overtly disruptive, subversive of or harmful to others). What is needed along side of truth in advertising and truth in lending is “truth in beliefs” disclosures within educational and health practices. Let the individual decide in matters of faith. At courthouses, let the law be the only thing represented. In schools and medicine, if a faith group wishes to be represented for its “benefits” to the followers of that faith, then those faith groups should be forthcoming and transparent about who they are and what they do. When these requirements are met, then let the parents and their children decide on participation.